<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;All That We See or Seem&#8230;&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216</link>
	<description>a guided tour thru strange cinema</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RayRay</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-13248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RayRay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-13248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks again for hosting!

I think the key to the whole &quot;dream lover&quot; scenario is in Irene&#039;s enraged confession to husband Howard. She&#039;s been the trophy wife for so long, locked up in that creepy manor, that any alternative is appealing. Any relationship between her and Barry (Robert Taylor) began as a figment of Howard&#039;s jealous imagination, but she seems amenable to it once it is suggested. I think it&#039;s intentional that she seems to have more chemistry with her former co-star Taylor than anyone else in the film.

Without giving the ending away, it becomes clear that her &quot;dream lover&quot; is more than her own sexual and emotional frustrations taken shape. Any shortcomings there are not a product of Irene&#039;s or Stanwyck&#039;s desires. I guess if the mystery man were more openly attractive, it would undercut the tone of menace that underlies his &quot;yammering&quot;. Agreed, though, that she plays a decidedly more passive character than her trademark femme fatales.

That would be an interesting intellectual exercise. Would this film work if the gender roles were reversed, perhaps with some older grande dame playing Taylor&#039;s blind wife (remaining menacing without falling prey to the customary exploitation and ridicule) and Stanwyck as the edgy attorney? Hmm. I like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again for hosting!</p>
<p>I think the key to the whole &#8220;dream lover&#8221; scenario is in Irene&#8217;s enraged confession to husband Howard. She&#8217;s been the trophy wife for so long, locked up in that creepy manor, that any alternative is appealing. Any relationship between her and Barry (Robert Taylor) began as a figment of Howard&#8217;s jealous imagination, but she seems amenable to it once it is suggested. I think it&#8217;s intentional that she seems to have more chemistry with her former co-star Taylor than anyone else in the film.</p>
<p>Without giving the ending away, it becomes clear that her &#8220;dream lover&#8221; is more than her own sexual and emotional frustrations taken shape. Any shortcomings there are not a product of Irene&#8217;s or Stanwyck&#8217;s desires. I guess if the mystery man were more openly attractive, it would undercut the tone of menace that underlies his &#8220;yammering&#8221;. Agreed, though, that she plays a decidedly more passive character than her trademark femme fatales.</p>
<p>That would be an interesting intellectual exercise. Would this film work if the gender roles were reversed, perhaps with some older grande dame playing Taylor&#8217;s blind wife (remaining menacing without falling prey to the customary exploitation and ridicule) and Stanwyck as the edgy attorney? Hmm. I like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aubyn Eli</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-13113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aubyn Eli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 01:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-13113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That shriek of Stanwyck&#039;s--it&#039;s like a soprano&#039;s dying aria! I haven&#039;t seen enough of Castle&#039;s work to judge where this one rates but I can definitely say I wasn&#039;t bored and I was always intrigued to see where it was going. I really appreciate that Castle didn&#039;t treat Stanwyck like a camp object or a faded beauty queen. So many post-&lt;i&gt;Baby Jane&lt;/i&gt; flicks really exploited older actresses and held them up to ridicule and this one doesn&#039;t. My main qualm with the film is the whole &quot;dream lover&quot; angle. Mainly because it&#039;s hard to imagine Stanwyck either fantasizing about or wanting this slick, weird courtship. So her passivity during the whole thing disturbs me; I keep expecting her to snap, &quot;Can it, brother,&quot; every time the mystery dream man starts yammering on. Still, the idea of being trapped in an endless, constantly shifting nightmare is pretty creepy and I find the chapel/mannequin scene horribly unsettling.

Cheers and thanks for a great contribution to the blogathon!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That shriek of Stanwyck&#8217;s&#8211;it&#8217;s like a soprano&#8217;s dying aria! I haven&#8217;t seen enough of Castle&#8217;s work to judge where this one rates but I can definitely say I wasn&#8217;t bored and I was always intrigued to see where it was going. I really appreciate that Castle didn&#8217;t treat Stanwyck like a camp object or a faded beauty queen. So many post-<i>Baby Jane</i> flicks really exploited older actresses and held them up to ridicule and this one doesn&#8217;t. My main qualm with the film is the whole &#8220;dream lover&#8221; angle. Mainly because it&#8217;s hard to imagine Stanwyck either fantasizing about or wanting this slick, weird courtship. So her passivity during the whole thing disturbs me; I keep expecting her to snap, &#8220;Can it, brother,&#8221; every time the mystery dream man starts yammering on. Still, the idea of being trapped in an endless, constantly shifting nightmare is pretty creepy and I find the chapel/mannequin scene horribly unsettling.</p>
<p>Cheers and thanks for a great contribution to the blogathon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Step Right Up! It&#8217;s The William Castle Blogathon: The Last Gasp!!! &#124; the last drive in</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-12425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Step Right Up! It&#8217;s The William Castle Blogathon: The Last Gasp!!! &#124; the last drive in]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-12425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at Weird Flix: Slaves of Babylon [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Weird Flix: Slaves of Babylon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Step Right Up! It&#8217;s The William Castle Blogathon: Day Four! &#124; the last drive in</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-12347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Step Right Up! It&#8217;s The William Castle Blogathon: Day Four! &#124; the last drive in]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-12347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at Weird Flix: Slaves of Babylon [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Weird Flix: Slaves of Babylon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Step Right Up! It&#8217;s The William Castle Blogathon: Day Three! &#124; the last drive in</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-12246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Step Right Up! It&#8217;s The William Castle Blogathon: Day Three! &#124; the last drive in]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-12246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at Weird Flix: Slaves of Babylon [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Weird Flix: Slaves of Babylon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Step Right Up! It&#8217;s The William Castle Blogathon: Day Two! &#124; the last drive in</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-12152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Step Right Up! It&#8217;s The William Castle Blogathon: Day Two! &#124; the last drive in]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-12152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at Weird Flix: Slaves of Babylon [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Weird Flix: Slaves of Babylon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-11984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo Gabriel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-11984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ray- I&#039;m sort of hooked on your site now!See you at the William Castle Blogathon fella-Cheers Joey]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray- I&#8217;m sort of hooked on your site now!See you at the William Castle Blogathon fella-Cheers Joey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamlette</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-11224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamlette]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-11224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow!  This sounds almost too scary for me -- but if I ever run across it, I&#039;ll give it a try, for Stanwyck&#039;s sake.  Great review!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  This sounds almost too scary for me &#8212; but if I ever run across it, I&#8217;ll give it a try, for Stanwyck&#8217;s sake.  Great review!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.A. Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-11098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R.A. Kerr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-11098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sounds like a must-see! I didn&#039;t realize Stanwyck and Taylor had done another movie together as late as 1964. Thanks for a great review.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a must-see! I didn&#8217;t realize Stanwyck and Taylor had done another movie together as late as 1964. Thanks for a great review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-11097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weirdflix.com/blog/?p=4216#comment-11097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RayRay, this is a great review--I&#039;m totally hooked and want to see Night Walker NOW!
Thanks,
Ivan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RayRay, this is a great review&#8211;I&#8217;m totally hooked and want to see Night Walker NOW!<br />
Thanks,<br />
Ivan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
